Article Detail

Home > Article Detail
  • P-ISSN 2233-4203
  • E-ISSN 2093-8950

Characterizations of Two-step Matrix Application Procedures for Imaging Mass Spectrometry

Mass Spectrometry Letters / Mass Spectrometry Letters, (P)2233-4203; (E)2093-8950
2015, v.6 no.1, pp.21-25
https://doi.org/10.5478/MSL.2015.6.1.21
Shimma Shuichi (National Cancer Center Research Institute)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

In this paper, I describe the importance of matrix spraying conditions in imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) to obtainsuccessful imaging results. My developed matrix application methodology, which is a “two-step matrix application” sequentiallycombined with matrix sublimation and spraying matrix solution can provide high reproducibility and high ion yield comparedwith a conventional direct spraying method. However, insufficient IMS results were obtained occasionally despite the two-stepmethod. Therefore, I wanted to characterize the methodology to continuously provide high quality data. According to my results,the sublimation time was not a strict parameter, and the most important step was the first spraying condition. This means that theextraction conditions from the tissue section and co-crystallization of the matrix were the most important factors.

keywords
imaging mass spectrometry, mass microscope, matrix application, tumor, anti-cancer agents, sample preparations


Reference

1

Shimma, S.. (2014). . Mass Spectrometry, 3, S0029-.

2

Shimma, S.. (2013). . J. Mass Spectrom, 48, 1285-.

3

Harada, T.. (2009). . Anal. Chem, 81, 9153-.

4

Sugiura, Y.. (2006). . Anal. Chem, 78, 8227-.

5

Beavis, R. C.. (1993). . J. Phys. D Appl. Phys, 26, 442-.

6

Chaurand, P.. (2004). . Anal. Chem, 76, 1145-.

7

Vorm, O.. (1994). . Anal. Chem, 66, 3281-.

8

Hankin, J. A.. (2007). . J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom, 18, 1646-.

9

Bouschen, W.. (2010). . Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom, 24, 355-.

Submission Date
2015-02-05
Revised Date
2015-03-10
Accepted Date
2015-03-10
상단으로 이동

Mass Spectrometry Letters